The Hill’s obsessive tweeting about Chelsea Clinton is starting to make people uncomfortable
It would take more research into Chelsea Clinton’s Twitter timeline than we can handle right now, but there’s been a very distinct change in the tone of her tweets ever since the inauguration. Not to suggest that the Clintons are a politically calculating bunch, but it’s almost as if, once the very last of the recount efforts went down in flames, someone flipped the switch on Chelsea’s back fromits standard “Wonky” setting to “Snarky.” Someone (or everyone) at The Hill must really like the new Chelsea, and yes, everyone’s noticed.
No, itwasn’t just Wednesday’s shocking report that Chelsea might be seeking office in the not-too-distant future.
Chelsea Clinton fuels speculation of political run: https://t.co/eyQSs6oI7y pic.twitter.com/fmRoxEJ06m
— The Hill (@thehill) March 15, 2017
@thehill The Hill is the only one trying to make this happen- #yuck. Your daily dose of Chelsea should come w/ an antibiotic #NoMoreClintons
— Denise O'Beirne (@OBeirnekids) March 15, 2017
I was worried The Hill wouldn't give me saturation Chelsea Clinton coverage today. I MUST know her every thought instantly! https://t.co/y1fVXiqz73
— John Hayward (@Doc_0) March 15, 2017
If Clinton really needed any fuel for her political run, she could just burn a pile of tweets from The Hill about her tweets.
@ComfortablySmug @jtLOL does anyone have a, "Hill tweets about Chelsea" tracker yet?
— Greg (@gandrew13) March 15, 2017
Glad you asked. We haven’t seen an app for that yet, but people have been doing manual counts recently.
The Hill has tweeted about Chelsea Clinton 70 times since late January. They tweet every story multiple times. https://t.co/jKpt22DFAy
— neontaster (@neontaster) March 7, 2017
Here is every 2017 tweet from @thehill that includes the words "Chelsea Clinton." pic.twitter.com/PuLQlSmPjf
— neontaster (@neontaster) March 7, 2017
.@thehill Seriously. Stop. Seek help. pic.twitter.com/a4ZZLaPjHf
— Bill (@thatbillokeefe) March 14, 2017
How Many Times Can @TheHill Tweet About Chelsea Clinton In Three Days? https://t.co/18uuc0aZBn
— Weasel Zippers (@weaselzippers) March 15, 2017
If anyone is keeping count (I am) – this is the 16th Chelsea Clinton story published by @thehill since January 23. https://t.co/l8M8Kxqhos
— neontaster (@neontaster) March 15, 2017
@neontaster @KurtSchlichter @thehill *only* #16? Seems like a LOT more…
— Miller (@Yakov2001) March 15, 2017
@neontaster @thehill I had the score at 15.
Must have missed one.
It's my favorite product unveiling on the web— StanleyFosha (@stanleyfosha) March 15, 2017
@thehill Did the Clinons buy The Hill or something? Every other Tweet is about Chelsea, even though she's doing nothing of value.
— Manannan (@WizardManannan) March 16, 2017
@neontaster @RichardGrenell @thehill Thank goodness that she (and Hillary) escaped the deadly Bosnian sniper more than 20 years ago
— SNARK-enfreude (@Fritzz2009) March 15, 2017
The Hill. All Chelsea, all the time. https://t.co/HQhCBGYmU6
— Ian McKelvey (@ian_mckelvey) March 14, 2017
@neontaster @allahpundit Oh good, I'm glad @thehill isn't trying to make @ChelseaClinton a thing.
— Mark Nova (@imarknova) March 15, 2017
@neontaster @thehill Stop trying to make Chelsea happen.
— Robert Tracinski (@Tracinski) March 15, 2017
@neontaster @thehill let's make Chelsea Clinton happen, people! Those spinach pancakes aren't going to make themselves!!!!!
— Axio M (@axio_matic) March 15, 2017
@neontaster How long before @thehill shows up outside Chelsea Clinton's bedroom window with a boombox blasting "In Your Eyes?"
— Will Harrison (@wharrison51) March 15, 2017
@neontaster @thehill pic.twitter.com/0JOEPyn7Nx
— Marie Arf (@schwingcat) March 15, 2017
@thehill
I'm a progressive Democrat. But, please.
.
Stop!
No. More. Clintons!
.
Please Stop!
.— Nan (@NanInKansas) March 15, 2017
@thehill Please stop.
— Georgia Fragale (@Gkoukla) March 16, 2017
@thehill just stop. PLEASE.
— Martin Belk (@Martin_Belk) March 16, 2017
googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(“div-gpt-300x250_1”); });
Comments are closed.