Enemy territory: Chuck Woolery asks progressives for impressions of Tea Party

http://twitter.com/#!/chuckwoolery/status/251402448143523841

Earlier today, the outspoken Tea Partyer noted the prevalence of liberals bashing his personal belief in limited government and Constitutional principles:

I must be doing something right. This site is loaded with Lib/Progressives. Love it.

— Chuck Woolery (@chuckwoolery) September 27, 2012

Tired of the petty arguments, Woolery ventured into enemy territory and asked progressives to lay all their Tea Party-bashing cards on the table:

Come on , your so ready to hate the Tea Party. Here is your chance. What do we stand for?

— Chuck Woolery (@chuckwoolery) September 27, 2012

Well, ask and you shall receive:

@chuckwoolery limited government and racism.

— Orange Grinder (@orangegrinder) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery selfish old white people retreating from society.

— 50mm Los Angeles (@50mmLosAngeles) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery The philosophy is incoherent regarding spending. They wanted cuts only after Obama elected. Spending binge started under Bush

— Christopher Swartout (@chrisswartout) September 27, 2012

https://twitter.com/ChadMosher/status/251403093558820864

.@chuckwoolery Pretty sure the Tea Party is about harvesting the internal organs of immigrants to fuel private enterprise?

— Jeffrey McManus (@jeffreymcmanus) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery Apparently, they hate anything that is not white or Christian. It also helps to be male and have a skewed sense of history.

— BookDude  (@Book_Dude) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery @GRYKING one for one and none for all.

— Greytdog (@Greytdog) September 27, 2012

That's easy @chuckwoolery. #TeaParty = Domestic Terrorists aka Racists.

— GEEZY (@GRYKING) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery Christian, Anti-Choice, Pro Gun, Cut social spending, Increase military, Cut taxes, and magically cut the deficit.

— DutchMantle (@RealDutchMantel) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery and no coloreds

— DutchMantle (@RealDutchMantel) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery It stands for keeping your nose buried deep in the ass of the wealthy. Smell that Chuck.

— Red Neck (@redneckviews) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery Seriously, what freedoms have you lost since Jan 20, 2009? List them please. This TP nonsense about "freedom" is infantile.

— Christopher Swartout (@chrisswartout) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery I can tell you what my dad and sisters think of Tea Party — none of it's flattering, & all of it assumes I'm a flaming moron.

— Angela Nelson (@angelaisms) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery A return to a past that never existed. Or less charitably, to a past that did exist.

— Morrtis (@morrtis_) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery Koch Brothers for King!

— Collide-A-Scope (@CMMR123) September 27, 2012

.@chuckwoolery Wait! Let me try again. Is it ‘Reducing the US tax rate until our infrastructure resembles that of Somalia?’

— Jeffrey McManus (@jeffreymcmanus) September 27, 2012

@DAbitty @chuckwoolery the tea party is the party of fear. and hate is a manifestation of that fear.

— Greytdog (@Greytdog) September 27, 2012

https://twitter.com/MikeQuinn88/status/251407353965080576

.@chuckwoolery Your tea party stands for hate, you just stand for GREED!

— Dee (@DAbitty) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery I think the Tea Party is run by Tom DeLay and his org FreedomWorks and the people that joined are racists.

— Slade Bivins (@SladeBivins) September 27, 2012

Ooo! Ooo! Don’t forget about Michelle Malkin and her minions!

Woolery was wholly unimpressed with their responses:

Well, to my point. You have no idea what you criticize. You know nothing about the Tea Party. Now, my friends, Tell them what we stand for.

— Chuck Woolery (@chuckwoolery) September 27, 2012

Tea Partyers were glad to answer the call:

@chuckwoolery People fall for the media's demonization, Chuck. We know it's about getting back to founding principles.

— Hunter (@THunterJ) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery The tea party wants limited government that protects the people and protects their freedoms.

— Hunter (@THunterJ) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery Liberty, justice, freedom, constitution

— Coleen Trusley (@coleenft) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery limited government

— powr2ppl (@powr2ppl) September 27, 2012

https://twitter.com/ToiletPaperTp1/status/251405208830234624

@chuckwoolery smaller government without cronyism, waste, fraud & abuse. less govt intrusion in our lives. accountability of our employees.

— Headshakers (@headshakers) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery We stand for less taxes, less govt and want our Constitution upheld.

— Kristin (@Kristinian66) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery We believe the government belongs TO US, not that we belong to the government.

— Miss'n Reagan (@IMissRWReagan) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery tea party = smaller, less intrusive government.

— Rspect Corpseman (@afdglock45) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery individual liberty, smaller government, lower taxes. it's not complicated at all.

— Tea Party Barb (@TeaPartyBarb) September 27, 2012

@chuckwoolery Small, limited govt; individual liberty; individual responsibility. Anyone who says otherwise is trying to sell you something.

— Angela Nelson (@angelaisms) September 27, 2012

Thank you all for letting them know what we stand for. Return to the principles of the Constitution, that our servants claim to uphold.

— Chuck Woolery (@chuckwoolery) September 27, 2012

All right, Twitchy readers. Now it’s your turn. How do you define the Tea Party?

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/09/27/enemy-territory-chuck-woolery-asks-progressives-for-impressions-of-tea-party/

Comments are closed.