Nick Searcy called it: Sick Sen. Reid says Gosnell was just too messy
http://twitter.com/#!/NumbersMuncher/status/334405488265555968
Harry Reid is not that morally bankrupt, is he?
Harry Reid just said that what led to the murder charges in the #Gosnell case was that the place wasn’t clean. shar.es/Zb1AR
— RB (@RBPundit) May 14, 2013
Yes, he is.
Here’s the video of Reid discussing Gosnell youtube.com/watch?feature=…
— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) May 14, 2013
In a revolting move, Sen. Reid also blamed pro-lifers, saying that people have been “pushed back into these holes” and that is what led to “convictions of murder for this man.”
The Weekly Standard has more from the sickening Harry Reid:
“I think to keep pushing these clinics back into the situations where they wind up like this is wrong,” Reid said. “I think no matter how you stand on the issue of abortion, people who make that decision should do it and not have to be worried about infections and some butcher like this doing the bad things they do. They should be in a place that’s clean and sterile and have people that know what they’re doing and care about what they do.”
How does he sleep at night?
There has to be a special hell for these people MT @mccormackjohnHere’s the video of Reid discussing Gosnell youtube.com/watch?feature=… …
— Sarah Nelson (@sarahsside) May 14, 2013
It is par for the course for the pro-abortion Left of which Sen. Reid is a part, even if he has claimed to be pro-life. Actor Nick Searcy called it last month, asking how pro-aborts could feign outrage at Gosnell. “Was he too messy,” he asked?
Harry Reid confirms it: the problem liberals have with #Gosnell is that he was too “messy.” weeklystandard.com/blogs/reid-ans…
— nick searcy (@yesnicksearcy) May 14, 2013
Gosnell’s crime wasn’t killing innocent babies. No, no! It was that he did it too shoddily. Should he have polished the jars in which he kept the severed feet of the babies he killed? Were the scissors that he used to snip their necks as he watched them gasp for their first, and last, breaths not shiny enough? Were the toilets in which babies were drowned not sparkling enough?
He dumped a baby that he killed in a shoe box. The baby was so large that his lifeless body hung over the sides. Should he have wrapped the shoe box in velvet to make it prettier, Sen. Reid? Then that would be hunky-dory to you, right? So, it’s just a question of aesthetics to Harry Reid. A gruesome killing machine in a house of horrors would be fine if that house of horrors was totally sterile.
Absolutely appalling.
Gosnell was convicted yesterday. Of course, he made a deal to escape the death penalty today. The innocent babies did not have that choice. And Harry Reid wants to keep it that way, only with more cleaning products.
Twitter users are rightly disgusted by the senator’s repugnant remarks.
Convicted of murder, not just unsterile conditions. RT @mccormackjohn: Reid on Gosnell: We need ‘clean & sterile’ late-term abortion clinics
— AG (@AG_Conservative) May 14, 2013
In which @harryreid confirms that he is a complete piece of shit weeklystandard.com/blogs/reid-ans…
— LilMissRightie (@LilMissRightie) May 14, 2013
Did you mean Pederast Harry Reid? MT @rbpundit: Harry Reid just said what led to murder charges in #Gosnell was that place wasn’t clean.
— L. North (@LadyLNorth) May 14, 2013
Sick. RT @mccormackjohn Link fixed: Reid on Gosnell: We need ‘clean and sterile’ late-term abortion clinics shar.es/Zb1AR
— RB (@RBPundit) May 14, 2013
Clean, sterile murder. RT @mccormackjohn: Reid on Gosnell: We need ‘clean and sterile’ late-term abortion clinics shar.es/Zb1AR
— Alo Konsen (@OhioCoastie) May 14, 2013
Babies murdered and @senharryreid wants to continue the practice in a more sanitized shop of horrors. weeklystandard.com/blogs/reid-ans…
— Karl G. Smith (@nevergiveup_kgs) May 14, 2013
Shorter Harry Reid: The problem with Auschwitz was the dirt. #Gosnell
— Will Antonin (@Will_Antonin) May 14, 2013
.@harryreid Glad to hear you want mass murder to be clean & sterile. I feel so much better now. shar.es/Zb1AR
— Alo Konsen (@OhioCoastie) May 14, 2013
“It was only murder because the place was dirty, you guys.” – Harry Reid, pederast. shar.es/Zb1AR
— RB (@RBPundit) May 14, 2013
Harry Reid does realize #Gosnell was charged for killing babies, not for having a messy clinic, right? weeklystandard.com/blogs/reid-ans… #prolife
— Andrew A Bair (@ProLifePolitics) May 14, 2013
Utterly sickening RT @mccormackjohn Reid on Gosnell: We need ‘clean and sterile’ late-term abortion clinics shar.es/Zb1AR
— Jason B. Whitman (@JasonBWhitman) May 14, 2013
Harry Reid proved just how low pro-aborts can go.
Harry Reid refuses to say whether he supports banning abortion after 5 MONTHS weeklystandard.com/blogs/reid-ans…
— Amanda Carpenter (@amandacarpenter) May 14, 2013
Harry Reid is taking a page from President Obama’s book. Pesky babies who refuse to “just come out limp and dead?” Whatever! What’s really important is that abortion remains untouchable. If nearly full-term babies are killed, as long as it’s “clean and sterile” then it’s all good.
Reid on Gosnell: We need ‘clean and sterile’ late-term abortion clinics.In other words, scrub up before you behead those kids. #tcot
— SoSaysGreggo (@SenorGreggo) May 14, 2013
“Reid says Gosnell is proof that access to safe legal abortion is needed” I say Reid is proof Nevadans need access to recall elections!
— Rich Bolen (@RichBolen) May 14, 2013
By the way, Sen. Reid, it was fear of the pro-abortion lobby that made authorities, including former Governor Ridge, neglect inspections in Pennsylvania. Read the grand jury report. It’s enlightening. As is the fact that “feminists” shriek at the first mention of inspections or standards for abortion clinics. Why? Because some would have to shut down rather than meet basic safety standards. Safety? Ha! It’s all about an agenda and blood money, off of which Gosnell certainly got rich.
Safe, legal and rare? Baloney.
Related:
Actor Nick Searcy slams pro-aborts: How can they feign outrage at Gosnell? Was he ‘too messy?’
Comments are closed.