http://twitter.com/#!/wendimclendonco/status/483707353435369472

Boycotting a store at which you don’t shop makes about as much sense as complaining about a SCOTUS ruling that exists only in your imagination. Clearly, getting a verified Twitter account is way easier than getting a clue.

Backbench celebrities and pundits are crawling out of the woodwork to make what they must believe are very wise and witty statements about the Hobby Lobby ruling.

http://twitter.com/#!/robinabcarian/status/483731861915832320

A lot of circumstances “shape” medical decisions, but the only coercion here was a government coercing Hobby Lobby. Nobody is coerced to work for them or for any other “closely held” company, and nobody has been forbidden from—heaven forbid—using their own money to pay for options not covered by their insurance.

http://twitter.com/#!/wendimclendonco/status/483722328405061632

Why is it “reasonable” to assume that employers are morally obligated to shop for personal services for their employees? “Reasonable” would be paying people for their work with money and letting them make their own decisions on how to spend it.

http://twitter.com/#!/kumailn/status/483715866001829888

Derp. Maybe you didn’t notice but the case was about the government butting into religion, not the other way around.

http://twitter.com/#!/ElayneBoosler/status/483722710929772545

Anyone know if Elayne is a drinker? Seriously.

http://twitter.com/#!/GhostPanther/status/483730398275313666

Some people aren’t even pretending to understand what the case was about. 

http://twitter.com/#!/best_coast/status/483732369929543680

Person miseducated about the Hobby Lobby case condemns miseducation about birth control.

http://twitter.com/#!/CharlesMBlow/status/483738796853571585

Name one religious precept imposed by Hobby Lobby. You can’t, Chucky.

http://twitter.com/#!/cenkuygur/status/483722683570331649

Sorry, Cenk. You didn’t build that. People don’t lose their religious liberty just because they hire someone for a job.

http://twitter.com/#!/Davidlaz/status/483739568651255808

Employer provided insurance is nothing but an unintended consequence of past progressive assclownery like wage and price controls. Remaining hidebound to it to the degree you start trampling religious freedom is not rational in the least. Rational insurance practice is the insurance customer finding their own insurance provider–as happens when someone insures their home, their car, their business, etc.

Deliver us from what liberals deem “rational.”

***

Related

Planned Parenthood’s Cecile Richards fights Hobby Lobby decision with safe, legal stupidity

Lena Dunham weighs in on SCOTUS’ Hobby Lobby ruling

‘Clueless or lying’: Sandra Fluke ‘purposefully ignoring’ fact in Hobby Lobby decision

Fu*k you:’ Left-wingers want to ‘burn down’ Hobby Lobby after SCOTUS win

 

 

 

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2014/06/30/rational-leftists-attacking-strawmen-with-religious-fervor/