Blonde PRIVILEGE? Lefty publications attack Conservative women for their appearce, call blondes RACIST
First Newsweek slut-shamed the Trump women for wearing high heels, and now some progressive garbage-pit publication we’ve never heard of before is attacking Conservative women for their appearance in general and accusing blonde women of being racists.
Can’t EVEN make this up.
Really banner day for progressive publications attacking conservative women for their appearance https://t.co/hEKwEcmYN4
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) August 11, 2017
From The Cut:
And then, of course, there are the politics of hair color. Attributes associated with whiteness light skin, narrow noses have dominated American beauty ideals as long as theres been such a thing. Which means that blondness has always been charged: The 50s gave us Doris Day, who once said that her only ambition ever had been to be a housewife in a good marriage (Preordination had other plans). To be blonde was to be a good American woman, pure of intention and heart which implied also, of course, that to be a good American woman, pure of intention and heart, meant being blonde. Betty was blonde, Veronica was trouble. Ditto Sandy and Rizzo. Hitchcock liked to cast blondes because he said they made the best victims: The color was virgin snow that shows up the bloody footprints.
Talk about epic loads of stupid, right there.
New York Magazine: Fox News women wearing their hair blonde is actually a racist dog whistle pic.twitter.com/M4c4uhuukW
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) August 11, 2017
if ( (window.__aa_fraud_serve === undefined) || (window.__aa_fraud_serve == true) ) { googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(“div-gpt-300x250_1”); }); }
Comments are closed.